Mindmark IP LawReviews of mindmarkiplaw.com

2108 N ST # 13895, Sacramento, California

Write a review Call Directions Website

The Fair Hearing score

4.5/ 5

Excellent

13 reviews

Mindmark IP Law4.5Excellent

Write a review

Rating distribution

Select a line to read only those reviews.

What customers rate

Honesty, pricing, process and quality scores appear once 5 customers have rated them.

About Mindmark IP Law

Mindmark IP Law provides complete trademark and intellectual property solutions to help businesses protect and strengthen their brands. Our services cover every stage of the process, including trademark search, filing, registration, monitoring, enforcement, and portfolio management, ensuring your brand remains secure and legally protected worldwide.With extensive experience working with UKIPO, USPTO, EUIPO, and WIPO, our team delivers reliable support for both startups and established companies. We focus on simplifying complex IP procedures, preventing infringements, and preserving your brand’s integrity so you can grow your business with confidence.

Mindmark IP Law (mindmarkiplaw.com) has 13 customer reviews on The Fair Hearing, with an average rating of 4.5 out of 5.

Also known as: mindmarkiplaw.com
Website: mindmarkiplaw.com
Category: Legal Service Providers
Location: Sacramento, California
Listed on The Fair Hearing: 2026

More in Legal Service Providers, California

Write a review

Sep 29, 2026

TERRIBLE TERRIBLE Law Office to work…

TERRIBLE TERRIBLE Law Office to work with for a Trademark for company Nothing but Crooks Please be aware

By Trina H.

Response from Mindmark IP Law· Sep 29, 2026

CLIENT’S FAILURE TO RESPOND TO USPTO REQUIREMENTS RESULTED IN APPLICATION ABANDONMENT We take client concerns seriously, but we also believe the public deserves an accurate account of what occurred. The characterization of Mindmark IP Law as “crooks” is not supported by the documented history of this matter. Mindmark IP Law prepared and filed the federal trademark application. The application subsequently received a Non-Final Office Action from the USPTO, identifying requirements that needed to be addressed for the application to proceed. Those requirements were communicated to the client. Most importantly, Mindmark IP Law did not abandon or terminate this application. A private law firm does not have the authority to declare a federal trademark application “dead.” That determination is made by the USPTO. The application was recorded as abandoned by the USPTO after the outstanding requirements were not addressed within the applicable response period. The client later requested that Mindmark IP Law withdraw as counsel, and that withdrawal request was submitted. USPTO records can take several business days to reflect administrative changes, so the firm's name remaining visible temporarily does not mean the withdrawal was not submitted. We also provided the client with the relevant USPTO correspondence and a detailed written explanation of the application's status. The documented correspondence speaks for itself. We respect the client's right to disagree with our position, but we cannot allow a public review to misrepresent the role of our firm or the actions taken by the USPTO.