LDA Pro Legal - Legal Document AssistantsReviews of ldaprolegal.com

Response from LDA Pro Legal - Legal Document Assistants· Jul 27, 2026

We take all feedback seriously; however, we have been unable to locate any client or service record under the name Mary Sofowara. The review also does not provide details about the service received or when the interaction occurred. We invite the reviewer to contact our office directly with additional information so we can verify the matter and address any legitimate concerns.

Response from LDA Pro Legal - Legal Document Assistants· Feb 23, 2026

We take concerns like this seriously and believe it is important to clarify the facts for anyone reading. Our services in this matter were provided directly to the client, with ongoing communication regarding required documents, disclosures, and next steps. As a registered Legal Document Assistant service, we prepare and process documents based strictly on the information and materials provided to us. We cannot finalize or file documents until all required information is received. The additional $100 referenced in this review was a court filing service fee for processing and submitting documents to the court. It was not an expedite fee. Court processing times — as well as California’s mandatory six-month waiting period in divorce matters — are determined by law and by the court, and are outside of our control. Once all required materials were received, the documents were properly prepared and filed. Final Judgment was officially entered by the Court on 09/02/2025. We stand by the accuracy of our work, our documented communications, and our compliance with California legal document preparation requirements. Divorce can be an emotional process, and timelines may feel longer than expected, but we remain committed to professional, compliant, and transparent service for every client. We wish the family well moving forward.

Response from LDA Pro Legal - Legal Document Assistants· Feb 17, 2026

We’re sorry to hear that you were dissatisfied with your experience. As a registered Unlawful Detainer Assistant in California, our office is authorized to provide assistance and information specific to eviction procedures. All notices and pleadings are prepared based on the information provided by the client, and drafts are sent for review prior to service to ensure accuracy. For more than a decade, we have assisted Northern California landlords and maintain a near-perfect record of obtaining Final Judgments for Possession when statutory procedures are properly followed. When litigation strategy or court representation is required, clients may also consult with our cooperating eviction attorney who has over twenty years of experience in unlawful detainer matters. We take communication, timeliness, and document precision seriously and remain committed to professional standards in every matter.

Response from LDA Pro Legal - Legal Document Assistants· Feb 19, 2024

Good morning Adam, I'm sorry this eviction case did not turn out the way you expected, after serving your own 30 day notice. You were adamant about using the 30 day notice that you claimed in an email to LDA Pro Legal, that an attorney you hired previously drafted for you. For so many reasons, we can not assert the validity of a notice that was not prepared and served by us. This was communicated with you verbally on many occasions and is also in our written contract for services. We always highly recommend utilizing our services to prepare and serve the notice, because the notice is the most critical part of the entire complaint. When you completed our intake form, you indicated the tenant had occupied for over one year. However at the time you served the 30 day notice, the tenant had been occupying for under one year. You were not thrilled or convinced to utilize our services to prepare and serve a new 60 day notice, despite our recommendation. We explained to you that a 30 Day Notice is most always acceptable for tenants who have been occupying for under a year, however the notice must be prepared and served correctly. We can not assert the validity of a notice that was not prepared and served by us. We didn't prepare the notice and we didn't serve the notice. We explained, that if the tenants file an Answer and the case goes to hearing, the notice will be scrutinized and could be deemed defective if it was not prepared and served correctly. Upon filing the complaint and attaching the 30 Day Notice, that an attorney you hired previously prepared and the landlord served, the Defendants filed an Answer. The Defendants claimed the notice was defective, along with multiple other Defendants answering the complaint claiming tenancy. We prepared additional documents to set the case up for hearing with the Defendants and all other occupants, in hopes of maybe reaching a settlement agreement with Defendants. Ultimately, you decided to dismiss the case and start over with a new notice, which is another possible resolution. Eviction cases are very complex at times and there are many variables involved. I understand the process is very frustrating. If you have any further questions or concerns please reach out to me directly. Thank you.