Final Round AIReviews of finalroundai.com

The answers are surface level. It will be great if one can select the area of knowledge where it can generate its answers and not just giving general answers to the questions. Example let’s say I am interviewing for a DevOps position I want it to answer questions in relationships to DevOps and not general IT answers

✅Positives (What I Liked) The support team is good and responsive. The application is continuously improving, leading to better responses over time. I trust the team to enhance the application further and capture a larger market in the future. ❌ Negatives (Areas of Improvement) Sometimes, the application struggles to generate answers. The responses are often generic, rather than focusing on real-time scenarios and industry challenges. 💡 Suggestions (How It Can Improve) Improve the real-time scenario-based answers to provide more practical and industry-relevant solutions. The technical manager should focus more on real-world challenges, industry trends, and domain-specific improvements. Enhance the AI’s ability to handle complex queries instead of providing only normal/generic responses. 🌟 Impressive Aspects The continuous development and updates show commitment to improving the application. User support is helpful and responsive, which builds trust in the product. The application has great potential, and I believe it will become a leading tool in the market with the right improvements.

I think you need to add the option for a teleprompter

I’ve been using Microsoft Co-pilot for a while now, and while it has some helpful features, it still feels like it’s finding its footing. On the positive side, it integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, making tasks like drafting emails, summarizing documents, and generating quick insights much faster. The interface is intuitive, and it feels like a natural extension of familiar tools like Word, Excel, and Teams. That said, Co-pilot isn’t always as reliable as I’d hoped. It occasionally misinterprets prompts or provides overly generic responses, requiring more manual tweaking than expected. For simple tasks, it’s great, but for more complex or nuanced requests, it sometimes falls short. If you’re looking for an assistant to streamline basic work tasks, it’s useful — but don’t expect it to replace strategic thinking or deep analysis. With some updates and refinement, I think Co-pilot could become a standout productivity tool.

I faced issues while interview didn't get response on time and overpriced

Till now only till 30 min works fine & then not behave properly

I frequently interview for highly technical positions in both research and engineering. Unfortunately, I found this tool to be inadequate for such specialized interviews. It falls short of what is required for these types of roles. When comparing its performance to other models, the latter provides far better responses to interview questions. The developers need to focus on creating a new mode specifically designed for technical interviews, rather than just improving the existing data or software. While the tool might be helpful for those who struggle significantly with interviews, I don't believe it justifies the current price. For someone who is fairly competent in interviewing, this tool doesn't add much value. Its primary usefulness lies in its ability to automate note-taking, but there are more cost-effective options available for that purpose. I would reconsider my opinion if significant improvements are made in the future.

It was very good at the starting, copilot was able to provide me the answer, But after two interviews, it was getting lack and Slow In providing the answers so I request the customer support to refund and Claire refunded the whole amount