DeloitteReviews of deloitte.com

Deloitte f fraud and scamming company in the name of consultancy they use chatgpt and fraud peoples

Non sono seri, hanno processi di selezione automatici e poco chiari. Date le dimensioni dovrebbero avere disponibilità di molti più posizioni aperte, invece sono sempre le solite che ripubblicano per eludere ed evadere la legge. Ho visto persone con zero esperienza lavorativa e con scarsa formazione universitaria entrare mentre persone altamente qualificate rigettate. Che realtà di M! Non entrateci che pagano una miseria per quanto riguarda il mercato del lavoro. Personalmente guadagnavo di più facendo il fruttivendolo mentre studiava!!

This was, without exaggeration, one of the most toxic and unsettling workplaces I have experienced. Behind the polished branding and endless talk of “values,” Deloitte Consulting felt hostile, intimidating, and deeply hypocritical. Employees were routinely made to feel disposable. In my experience, communications around money—whether related to benefits, exits, or internal policies—were handled in a way that felt aggressive and threatening rather than professional. Instead of clarity or support, fear was used as a management tool. The power imbalance was obvious and unapologetic. Question decisions, raise concerns, or ask for fairness, and you quickly learn that silence and compliance are what’s actually rewarded. Leadership talks about integrity, but accountability seems to exist only for those at the bottom. What made this even worse was the firm’s performative approach to “culture” and recruitment. So-called engagement and networking initiatives felt careless and exclusionary, with little regard for personal, cultural, or religious boundaries. Rather than creating an inclusive workplace, these choices sent a clear message: adapt, stay quiet, or don’t belong here. The constant disconnect between Deloitte’s public image and internal reality is exhausting. Ethics are marketed aggressively, but when they become inconvenient, they are quietly sidelined. Burnout is normalized. Concerns are dismissed. And the brand name is used as a shield against criticism. I would strongly warn anyone considering Deloitte Consulting—especially early-career professionals—to think very carefully. Ask uncomfortable questions. Get everything in writing. And do not assume that a big name guarantees professionalism or respect. In my experience, it does not.

I am writing this to express my utter frustration and dissatisfaction with the current state of Deloitte’s tax declaration service. The lack of communication regarding the progress of my filing, combined with inexcusably slow internal processes, has become completely unacceptable. To make matters worse, their platform was updated and moved without any prior notice. This transition has rendered my existing login credentials useless, resulting in a blocked account and zero access to my sensitive financial data.

Deloitte Luxembourg - Extremely slow and no detailed advice We cooperated with Deloitte's Luxembourg office . They promised the involved law firm each week over a 10 week-period that they deliver their advice on Friday of the respective week. Finally, they delivered only superficial comments with caveats on Friday before Christmas when people left for the holiday season. This behaviour is not professional. As a result, I had to cancel my holidays in the week of Christmas to get things done.

I worked for Deloitte Israel (Tel Aviv branch) at the HRT (Human Resource Transformation). The management was manipulative - the chief architect and the partner were both manipulative and they were liars. The chief architect made the career coaching thing an incentive to make me work extra hours, and work even on holidays to leave a good impression on the client. Turns out that the transitioning to the new job wasn't even possible, and that he double crossed me, both him (the chief architect and the partner gave different versions - giving a good clue that they made stuff up and didn't even bother to coordinate versions because they're so st**id. At the end, when they wanted to terminate me, the chief architect mocked me and humiliated me in front of the other collogues, in the hopes that I would lash out at him, in a way that would allow him to legally deny paying termination funds when I'm gone. Thankfully I didn't lash out, but the attempt and that the HR kept defending him and denying his mocking made me second guess the morals of this department, and all I got is that they are greedy for money. This case was worth filing a complaint about in the police department and to sue this company, but I felt so sorry for such low moral levels that I've decided to spare them, but will never work there again.

In base a quello che ho vissuto, è un ambiente in cui impegno e serietà spesso non trovano il giusto riconoscimento. In diverse situazioni, mi è parso che le simpatie personali potessero avere un peso maggiore rispetto alla competenza effettiva. Nella mia esperienza, nonostante la dedizione costantemente dimostrata nel lavoro, mi è sembrato che fosse piuttosto facile finire oggetto di critiche non sempre fondate su dati oggettivi. In alcune situazioni, ho avuto l'impressione che tali giudizi fossero accolti senza un' adeguata verifica, riflettendo più percezioni personali che una reale valutazione del lavoro svolto. Esporre le criticità, pur con spirito costruttivo, non ha, nella mia esperienza, portato ai miglioramenti auspicati. Al contrario, ha contribuito a un irrigidimento del clima lavorativo. Mi sembra che tale contesto non possa fare altro che indurre a rivalutare la propria permanenza, portando a considerare le dimissioni come una scelta inevitabile, sebbene formalmente volontaria. Il vantaggio di questo lavoro, a mio avviso, è dato dalla possibilità di apprendere velocemente una varietà di competenze, spendibilissime altrove.

La quintessenza dell'azienda-sbobba. Crea annunci di lavoro per intern (o stage; rigorosamente sotto pagati), ma richiede implicitamente esperienza fuffa. Come si sostengono aziende con rating simili?