The tests are an absolute farce
The tests are an absolute farce. They are all closed-book tests under extreme time pressure. Nobody does an actual job under closed-book conditions. Employers don't pay a salary to get a reference manual. Employers who think coding is supposed to feel like the gunfight at the OK Corral are rare and misguided. I scored well on stuff I knew nothing about and badly in my main areas of expertise. The AI prompting test was about problems that would never arise or that you could solve in a dozen lines of bash. The coding tests are not even leetcode-easy standard but just very time consuming. They howl about the importance of not practicing a standard IQ test like what they've been selling in paperbacks for decades. The most farcical test asked me to write pseudocode for what required a single SQL statement. Who told these guys that team leaders write pseudocode for their team anyway? Or that one would attempt to define a detailed mathematical algorithm before even capturing the data? Or that a stakeholder would ever write a whole page of A4 about what they want? Have they never heard of Agile? They have absolutely no clue how the industry works, but they presume to judge people with CVs that clearly show far more experience than whoever is writing these tests. I would not work for any company dumb enough to get ripped off by crossover.
By Adrian M.

