AfterQuery ExpertsReviews of afterquery.com

I found the whole thing to be confusing and not having any kind of helpful sending you in a certain direction it just tells you to take these pictures and send them in but you didn't know that you had to take those pictures so then you're late taking the pictures and then you don't even know what you're supposed to be taking pictures of I just found the whole entire process confusing

Afterquery is willing to be a good platform but I feel they are not putting all it takes to becoming what they want to be. Projects forever before you can get one and don’t even last up to 24 hours after they are out

about long assessment review that has been a main challenge also unreviewed applications which have almost finish 2months without any feedback and lack of active project .if you could give us updates on what time projects appear we will appreciate that as it will help us know how fast we need to finish our projects before they dissappear .Aside from that the experience here has been great.

I will give the platform 3 stars. They are good at paying, I have received exactly what they have promised to pay and they money appears on my bank account in less than 24 hrs. The only problem is that it takes long to verify the project done. I did a project 40 days ago, and my submissions are still being reviewed.

Projects takes forever to be reviewed, hence delaying payments. Another thing is that complex projects might be paused for collection before you get to submit a task that you've been working for more than ten hours. otherwise everything else is just fine. They are authentic.

My only issue with the platform is time taken for submissions to be reviewed and payment to be made. If the submissions are reviewed on time it'd be motivating to work on more projects. Also, I don't understand why they take way too long to give projects and you have to stay with the account without a single project to be Workin on. It makes it a bit unreliable.

A very good upcoming platform in the area of AI training, good and clear communication with contractors on what needs to be done with regard to the tasks. One major gripe is the speed with reveiwing tasks, a task can be left unreveiwed for months with no information communicated to contractors. Obviously this affects payment and progression on the platform as you need a certain amount of work passed to be certified as an expert.

I have also contributed to Project Aid and Golden Dog (Cross Search Benchmark) as an expert. The task design is excellent; the QA process (AI-generation check, difficulty probe, rollout review, judge reconciliation) is rigorous and clearly aimed at high-quality output. Unfortunately, there are significant practical issues associated with it, which cost contributors time, money, and trust: 1. The review cycle is way too long. I submitted tasks to Project Aid more than five weeks ago, and out of 10 tasks only 4 have been reviewed and compensated so far. Nothing is known about the reasons behind the delay or about what kind of timeline is expected for the other tasks. While experts manage to do their job within a reasonable period of time, the review process does not keep up with them. 2. Tasks are stopped during submission phase without any warnings or schedule. The restriction on the number of submitted tasks per expert is reasonable, however, there is no information about submission period and deadline provided in advance. I was almost ready with all three gating checks and difficulty probe when the submission for Golden Dog has been stopped unexpectedly. The contributor doesn't know if there is still time to submit something in a reasonable period of time. If there is a limit on the submission number, the deadline has to be clearly stated in order to provide some timeframe instead of an unexpected stopping point. 3. Lack of email notifications when the project is opened again and lack of consistent support features. Golden Dog was opened again after the stoppage without any notification; I found out about it only from my own dashboard check. Project Aid provides in-dashboard "Chats and QA" feature, which allows contacting the project team, but Golden Dog does not provide such feature. The support representative has responded to my concerns appropriately, which I appreciate. Still, the platform needs to deal with the issues of review speed and notifications in order to match the quality of work requested from contributors.