briandumasattorney.comReviews of briandumasattorney.com

I hired Brian to represent me in a Family Court case, and the results were very satisfactory. Brian is not only sharp, knowledgeable but very meticulous and prepares you and the documentation for hearings extremely well with the dexterity and precision of a highly skilled good surgeon. I have worked in the past with at least 7 other attorneys and have never seen anyone as proficient and effective as Brian. Having to find an attorney is one of those things nobody want to worry about but when you need one, I can assure you, Brian is then one (if not the best one) you can have on your side. Without any doubt I highly recommend Brian based on actual recent experience

The subject under investigation, for this complaint for his offenses is one Brian Dumas, with contact information as follows: • Brian O. Dumas; 2216 Bee Ridge Road; Columbia, SC 29223; DOB = 1/2/**; (803)-736-2058; bulldogbandit?sc.rr.com Among the many offenses and crimes that Brian Dumas has committed against his victims, clients, and our rule of law, as an oxymoronical practicing attorney is the following • Brian Dumas has been convicted of three driving under the influence offenses. • Brian Dumas’ has lost his driver’s license, driving privileges, and ability to drive. • Brian Dumas has possessed and used controlled substances with other attorneys. • Brian Dumas has possessed and used cocaine with other attorneys. • Brian Dumas was found guilty in violating South Carolina Supreme Court Rule 32 Code of Professional Responsibility. • Brian Dumas was found guilty of committing conduct of dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation DR 1-102(A). • Brian Dumas was found guilty of entering business transactions with clients without client consent after full disclosure DR 5-104(A). • Brian Dumas was found guilty of neglecting legal matters entrusted to him DR-101(A)(3). • Brian Dumas was found guilty of intentionally failing to carry out a contract with a client for professional services. • Brian Dumas was found guilty of intentionally prejudicing and damaging his client during the course of their professional relationship DR 9-102(A). • Brian Dumas was found guilty of not depositing his clients’ funds in identifiable bank accounts DR 9-102(A). • Brian Dumas was found guilty of not maintaining complete records of all funds and properties of his clients and rendering appropriate accounts to his clients DR 9-102(B). • The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Brian Dumas did not meet the ethical standards for which he is bound as an attorney, by which he is not eligible to be an attorney, and must be disbarred. • The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Brian Dumas ruled that Brian Dumas injured his clients. • The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Brian Dumas adversely reflects upon attorneys who strict to discharge their duties honestly. • The South Carolina Supreme Court ordered Brian Dumas to pay restitution to his victims in full, complying with DR 9-102(B). • South Carolina Attorney General Travis Medlock along with Assistant Attorneys General James Bogle and Emory Smith prosecuted Brian Dumas for Plaintiffs Tana Hutto, James Duoucette, Bambi Jo Flynt, John Preacher, James Daniels, Aubrey Gilmore, Elizabeth Pilot, and the State of South Carolina. • Brian Dumas was found guilty of committing acts of misconduct towards several clients by the South Carolina Supreme Court. • Brian Dumas was found guilty of engaging in activities to bring the legal profession into disrepute by the South Carolina Supreme Court. • Brian Dumas was found guilty and disbarred before a Panel of the Board of Commissioners of Grievances and Discipline following six days of testimony. • The Executive Committee of the Board adopted the Panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and also determined Brian Dumas to be disbarred. These actions are shown in Volume 309 Report Series 5 of South Carolina Supreme Court 309 S.C. 5 and Volume 419 Second Edition Report Series 791 of South Carolina Supreme Court 419 S.E.2d 791. This is cited in Exhibit A. The Committee on Character and Fitness of the South Carolina Supreme Court denied Brian Dumas petition for reinstatement in Volume 360 Report Series 33 of South Carolina Supreme Court 360 S.C. 33 and Volume 600 Second Edition Report Series 61 of South Carolina Supreme Court 600 S.E.2d 61. This is cited in Exhibit B. More of Brian Dumas victims are Seth G. Niles, Raymond Bovain Jr, Willor Dean Bovain, and Tara Cook. In these actions, Brian Dumas publishes default judgments against Seth Giles in the Columbia Star. Brian Dumas worked to deny insurance benefits for the surviving husband Raymond Bovain Jr of his deceased wife Willor Dean Bovain who was killed from a collision with a truck on I-26, whose car was struck from behind, burst into flames, and died at the scene. Brian Dumas filed a foreclosure against the property owned by Tara Cook in the Columbia Star. These are cited in Exhibit C.